At DeNovo, we take immense pride in the high quality of legal cost services that we provide. As one of the top legal costs consultancies in the UK, our team commits to providing the highest quality expert support. We tailor our services to meet each client's specific needs.
Our costs lawyers and legal costs draftsmen are highly trained. They also constantly update their knowledge of the latest legal practices and regulations. This commitment to excellence ensures that we consistently deliver accurate, efficient, and reliable legal cost services.
Our team comprises highly skilled professionals who have undergone rigorous training. They train to meet the highest standards in the legal industry. Each of our costs lawyers and draftsmen possesses the necessary knowledge and expertise.
Whether you are a solicitor, law firm, or individual client, we are prepared to manage your legal costs. We approach every case with the utmost professionalism. Our team pays close attention to every detail.
DeNovo was one of the early adopters of the new format inter partes bill of costs (Costs Precedent S). This format is commonly known as the ‘Jackson bill’ and provides an extremely detailed account of solicitors’ fees and disbursements. Getting the most out of Precedent S – whether as receiving or paying party – requires well developed IT and analytical skills. The prescribed form and content for Precedent S (and for other commonly used costs precedents) – as well as some examples - can be found in the Practice Direction to CPR 47, here.
Our forward-thinking approach has helped us stay at the forefront of the legal costs industry. By embracing new practices, we are able to streamline the process of preparing legal costs claims, whilst ensuring cost effective and efficient results.
Whether you require a bill of costs (Costs Precedent S or other) for inter parties detailed assessment or need assistance with a Solicitors Act 1974 breakdown (Costs Precedent P), we are here to help.
We aim to ensure that every aspect of your legal costs claim is accurately documented and presented in the best light for assessment. Our experienced team will work closely with you to understand your unique requirements.
At DeNovo, we understand that every client has unique needs. For that reason we offer flexible and competitive terms for all our services.
We provide personalised solutions that fit your budget and goals. We believe in delivering value for money while maintaining the highest standards of service and professionalism.
When you choose DeNovo, you are partnering with a trusted legal costs consultancy. We are committed to excellence in delivery of our services. Our skilled team and innovative practices set us apart in the industry. We dedicate ourselves to client satisfaction, ensuring we meet your needs.
We invite you to contact us today to learn more about our services and discuss how we can assist you with your legal costs. With DeNovo, we handle your legal costs efficiently, accurately, and professionally.
Education/admissions
Afqar is involved in the firm's diversity initiatives and a keen advocate for social mobility and opportunities for all.
Afqar was amongst the first in our profession become a regulated Costs Lawyer. He enjoys rights of audience in relation all costs proceedings.
Afqar is also an accredited training provider.
Experience and notable cases
Kuwait Airways Corporation (KAC) –v- Iraqi Airways Company (IAC) – Following the longest running commercial case in the history of the English courts I prepared KAC’s massive costs claim, one the largest ever to reach the doors of the Senior Courts Costs Office. Legal costs claim of >£40M.
Pharma patent litigation – I was instructed by a leading global law firm on behalf of the successful parties in patent infringement and revocation proceedings involving some of the world’s largest pharmaceutical companies. Legal costs claim of >£5M.
Telecoms patent litigation – I was instructed by a top tier specialist firm of patent litigators to prepare various complex costs statements following trials and appeals involving some of the world’s largest technology corporations. Legal costs claim of >£10M.
High-profile costs claim following failed £100M civil recovery proceedings – instructed by a market leading international litigation team acting for a foreign citizen whose worldwide assets were subject of a civil recovery claim brought by the National Crime Agency (NCA). My team and I prepared a number of high value interrelated claims for costs on behalf of the successful party . Legal costs claim of >£5M.
Excalibur Ventures v Texas Keystone – The case generated several decisions of wider importance in the legal costs field (relating to security for costs, indemnity costs, and the availability of a non-party costs order against professional funders – a point on which the Association of Litigation Funders also intervened). I prepared the successful party's costs breakdowns and provided witness statements in support of its security for costs applications. Following the conclusion of the substantive litigation I prepared the defendant’s £20M> costs breakdown.
Challenge to remuneration and expenses of joint administrators – instructed by a market leading international litigation team: I was instructed to prepare a detailed challenge to the charges of a global financial consultancy and their advisers (including two high-profile international law firms), in connection with the administration of a UK energy supplier. The application for assessment of fees and expenses of >£5M under the Insolvency Act 1986 was the first significant challenge of its kind in 20 years.
Education
LLB (Hons) – University of London (1994)
LLM (Distinction) – University of East Anglia (2018)
PhD (law) - University of East Anglia (2024)
Professional and research interests: Costs law and practice, litigation funding, responsibility theory, vicarious liability, products liability, litigation practice, philosophical foundations of tort law. My doctoral thesis examined relationships between (pre-moral, pre-legal) outcome responsibility and strict tortious obligations of repair. Time permitting, future research output will address aspects of costs law and practice, third party litigation funding, as well as approaches to responsibility for harm caused by intelligent products (for ‘algorithmic accidents’).
