DeNovo Law
  • Home
  • People
  • Services
    • Costs Negotiations
    • Costs Monitoring
    • Costs Seminars
    • Bill of Costs
    • Schedules of Costs
    • Submissions
    • Advocacy
    • Cost Budgets
  • News
  • Careers
  • Seminars
  • Contact us
DeNovo Law
  • Home
  • People
  • Services
    • Costs Negotiations
    • Costs Monitoring
    • Costs Seminars
    • Bill of Costs
    • Schedules of Costs
    • Submissions
    • Advocacy
    • Cost Budgets
  • News
  • Careers
  • Seminars
  • Contact us

linkedin

Costs Budget
 

Costs Budget

Costs Budgeting Services

Expert Legal Cost Budgeting Support

Our team of legal costs experts specialise in all aspects of cost budgeting. We provide accurate, tailored budgets designed to meet the unique demands of your case. With foresight and precision, we ensure your budget safeguards against potential challenges, helping you avoid irreversible difficulties later in the process.

Whether you need a budget for commercial litigation, specialist cases, or support in preparing or challenging cost budgets, we’re here to help.

Understanding Legal Cost Budgeting

Legal cost budgeting is a critical component of managing legal expenses. Without a clear plan, costs can escalate unexpectedly, creating financial strain. A well-structured budget ensures effective cost management, allowing legal teams to allocate resources efficiently and avoid unnecessary expenses.

Proper budgeting leads to smarter financial decisions, helping clients achieve optimal legal outcomes without overspending.

Our Services

Precedent H: Preparing Cost Budgets

A well drafted Precedent H budget is essential for managing litigation expenses. We work closely with clients to create detailed, accurate budgets that reflect expected costs. Our tailored approach ensures budgets align with case strategies, helping legal teams stay on track and avoid financial pitfalls.

  • Case-Specific Budgets: We customise budgets to match the unique demands of each case.
  • Comprehensive Planning: We clearly outline all anticipated expenses to ensure transparency.
  • Guidance: Through our experience we guide clients through potential areas of future costs they may have overlooked.

Precedent R: Budget Discussion Reports

Budget discussion reports (Precedent R) are vital for negotiations, particularly in multi-party cases. Our experts provide robustly drafted reports to support the Precedent H.

  • Budget Comparisons: We analyse and compare budgets to identify discrepancies and ensure fairness.
  • Strategic Advice: We guide clients through discussions to reach agreements.
  • Negotiation Support: We assist directly in talks or provide key insights to strengthen arguments.

Clear, well-prepared reports improve negotiation outcomes and help avoid financial disputes.

Precedent T: Budget Adjustments

Litigation is dynamic, and budgets often require adjustments. Through Precedent T, we help clients make necessary changes.

  • Assessing Justifications: We evaluate whether changes (e.g., trial delays, new evidence) warrant budget adjustments.
  • Timing: We can offer advice on the timing of any revision whether upwards or downwards
  • Advocacy Services: We work alongside your counsel in the presentation of your revised budget.

Through timely intervention, we help avoid future disallowance of costs.

High-Volume and Specialised Litigation Support

We support both one-off commercial cases and ongoing high-volume litigation, offering scalable solutions for law firms and corporate clients.

  • Scalable Solutions: Flexible service packages for high-volume cases.
  • Specialist Knowledge: Expertise in commercial litigation, Banking, Media and IP disputes.
  • Technology-Driven Efficiency: Advanced cost management tools to improve accuracy and streamline budgeting.

Common Cost Budgeting Mistakes to Avoid

Many clients face challenges due to common budgeting errors, including:

  • Underestimating or Overestimating Costs: Failing to account for all expenses can lead to budget shortfalls or court criticism.
  • Lack of Detail: Poorly phased budgets can result in lost fees, disputes, and court disapproval.

We help clients avoid these mistakes by providing expert guidance and detailed budgeting support.

Competitive Pricing and Custom Service Options

We understand the importance of cost management and offer high-quality services at fair prices.

  • Fixed-Fee and Hourly Options: Choose the pricing model that works best for your budget.
  • Custom Service Packages: Select the level of support you need.
  • No-Obligation Consultations: Initial consultations to understand your needs and provide tailored advice.

Why Choose Us?

We have a proven track record of:

  • Expertise and Experience: Our team consists of skilled legal cost professionals.
  • Client-Focused Approach: We prioritise your needs and deliver tailored solutions.
  • Proven Results: We’ve helped numerous clients in drafting budgets in some of the largest cases where budgeting has been ordered.

Get in Touch

We’d love to discuss your needs and show you how we can help manage your legal costs. Contact us today to schedule a consultation or learn more about our services.

Make an Enquiry

Please let us know your name.
Invalid Input
Invalid Input
Please let us know your email address.
Invalid Input
Please write a subject for your message.
Please let us know your message.
Telephone: +44 (0)20 3633 6827
Email: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
costs lawyers
  • Cookies Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Complaints Procedure
  • Equality and Diversity
  • Sitemap
  • Costs Lawyers
  • Precedent S
  • Litigation costs
  • Costs Budget
  • Costs Budget
  • Bill of Costs
Copyright © 2025 DeNovo Law. All Rights Reserved.
Website design by Identity - Ipswich Web Design
Submit you CV

Please let us know your name.
Please let us know your email address.
Please write a subject for your message.
Please let us know your message.
Invalid Input

Afqar (Aff) Dean, Director

Afqar Dean is a leading legal costs specialist with over 30 years’ experience advising on high-value and complex disputes across multiple jurisdictions, including England and Wales, the Dubai International Financial Centre, Jersey, and British Overseas Territories.

He has acted on some of the UK’s most significant commercial litigation cases, representing and advising an extraordinary range of clients — from multinational corporations and major law firms to high-profile individuals, including political figures, members of royal families, sports stars, and entertainers.

Afqar’s expertise covers all aspects of contentious costs, including costs budgeting, assessments, solicitor–client disputes, professional negligence claims, and costs issues in international arbitration. He is also highly experienced in auditing legal costs, ensuring compliance, accuracy, and financial transparency for clients.

Among the first practitioners to qualify as a regulated Costs Lawyer, Afqar holds full rights of audience in costs proceedings. He is also a training provider, delivering bespoke seminars and education programmes for law firms and legal teams. A strong advocate for diversity and social mobility within the profession, Afqar is committed to widening access and opportunity in legal practice.

Education/admissions

Afqar is involved in the firm's diversity initiatives and a keen advocate for social mobility and opportunities for all.

Afqar was amongst the first in our profession become a regulated Costs Lawyer.  He enjoys rights of audience in relation all costs proceedings.

Afqar is also an accredited training provider.

Dr Michael Heslin, Director

Michael Heslin is a Costs Draftsman with over 25 years’ experience acting in some of the most substantial and complex costs disputes in the UK. He co-founded DeNovo in 2004 and has since built it into one of the country’s leading independent costs consultancies, trusted by top UK and international law firms, insurers, and private clients.

Michael has personally prepared or defended more than 100 multi-million-pound costs claims, including several of the largest to come before the Senior Courts Costs Office. His experience spans high-value commercial litigation, intellectual property disputes, clinical negligence claims, and solicitor-client assessments. Notable projects include preparing Kuwait Airways’ £40M+ costs claim following the longest-running case in the history of the Commercial Courts, major pharma and telecoms patent litigation costs cases involving household-name multinationals, and acting in the Excalibur Ventures case — which included a landmark decision on costs and litigation funding.

Alongside his fee-earning practice, Michael has extensive management and mentoring experience. At DeNovo he has trained and led teams of costs lawyers and consultants, overseeing projects of prodigious scale. He has also provided seminars and training to leading law firms, blogged extensively on developments in costs law, and acted as an expert witness in costs litigation

Michael’s academic credentials are exceptional within the profession. He holds an LL.B (Hons), an LL.M (Distinction) focused on commercial litigation, and a PhD in Law from the University of East Anglia, awarded in 2024 for a thesis on responsibility theory and enterprise liability. He is also currently undertaking further postgraduate study in Competition and Regulatory Policy at the internationally renowned Centre for Competition Policy, reflecting his ongoing commitment to advanced legal and policy research.

Clients value Michael for his combination of technical precision, strategic insight, and clear communication. Whether working on behalf of paying or receiving parties, he brings authority, creativity, and a results-driven approach to the resolution of costs disputes.

Experience and notable cases

Kuwait Airways Corporation (KAC) –v- Iraqi Airways Company (IAC) – Following the longest running commercial case in the history of the English courts I prepared KAC’s massive costs claim, one the largest ever to reach the doors of the Senior Courts Costs Office. Legal costs claim of >£40M.

Pharma patent litigation – I was instructed by a leading global law firm on behalf of the successful parties in patent infringement and revocation proceedings involving some of the world’s largest pharmaceutical companies. Legal costs claim of >£5M.

Telecoms patent litigation – I was instructed by a top tier specialist firm of patent litigators to prepare various complex costs statements following trials and appeals involving some of the world’s largest technology corporations. Legal costs claim of >£10M.

High-profile costs claim following failed £100M civil recovery proceedings – instructed by a market leading international litigation team acting for a foreign citizen whose worldwide assets were subject of a civil recovery claim brought by the National Crime Agency (NCA). My team and I prepared a number of high value interrelated claims for costs on behalf of the successful party . Legal costs claim of >£5M.

Excalibur Ventures v Texas Keystone – The case generated several decisions of wider importance in the legal costs field (relating to security for costs, indemnity costs, and the availability of a non-party costs order against professional funders – a point on which the Association of Litigation Funders also intervened). I prepared the successful party's costs breakdowns and provided witness statements in support of its security for costs applications. Following the conclusion of the substantive litigation I prepared the defendant’s £20M> costs breakdown.

Challenge to remuneration and expenses of joint administrators – instructed by a market leading international litigation team: I was instructed to prepare a detailed challenge to the charges of a global financial consultancy and their advisers (including two high-profile international law firms), in connection with the administration of a UK energy supplier. The application for assessment of fees and expenses of >£5M under the Insolvency Act 1986 was the first significant challenge of its kind in 20 years.

Education

LLB (Hons) – University of London (1994)

LLM (Distinction) – University of East Anglia (2018)

PhD (law) - University of East Anglia (2024)

Professional and research interests: Costs law and practice, litigation funding, responsibility theory, vicarious liability, products liability, litigation practice, philosophical foundations of tort law. My doctoral thesis examined relationships between (pre-moral, pre-legal) outcome responsibility and strict tortious obligations of repair. Time permitting, future research output will address aspects of costs law and practice, third party litigation funding, as well as approaches to responsibility for harm caused by intelligent products (for ‘algorithmic accidents’).