The person certifying a bill of costs must be identified, the High Court has ruled. Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals NHS Trust v AKC appealed a decision of Master Nagalingham who had refused to strike out a bill of costs for non compliance where the signature on the certificate was illegible and the signatory was not identified.



Mrs Justice Steyn DBE ruled that as a matter of ordinary interpretation '...bearing in mind the purpose of certification, it is implicit that the solicitor who signs the certificates must be readily identifiable on the face of those certificates...'. She also expressed her 'astonishment' that Irwin Mitchell for the receiving party had refused to identify the signatory to the bill, commenting ...'how little effort it would have taken to provide the name of the signatory for which the appellant had asked...'

Full Judgement

The person certifying a bill of costs must be identified, the High Court has ruled. Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals NHS Trust v AKC appealed a decision of Master Nagalingham who had refused to strike out a bill of costs for non compliance where the signature on the certificate was illegible and the signatory was not identified.



Mrs Justice Steyn DBE ruled that as a matter of ordinary interpretation '...bearing in mind the purpose of certification, it is implicit that the solicitor who signs the certificates must be readily identifiable on the face of those certificates...'. She also expressed her 'astonishment' that Irwin Mitchell for the receiving party had refused to identify the signatory to the bill, commenting ...'how little effort it would have taken to provide the name of the signatory for which the appellant had asked...'

Full Judgement